Legal Opinion
State v. Theodosopoulos
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 15, 2006No. 2005-278PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGalway, J.
The petitioner, the State of New Hampshire, filed a petition for writ of certiorari pursuant to RSA 490:4 (1997) and Supreme Court Rule 11, challenging a decision of the Hooksett District Court (Sobel, J.) granting defendant Thomas Theodosopoulos’ motion to compel discovery. We deny the petition.
The record supports the following facts. On October 18, 2004, the defendant was involved in a motor vehicle collision on Route 3, in Hooksett, with a vehicle driven by Jason Defina, an off-duty Hooksett police officer. Police officers from the Town of Hooksett were the first police officers to respond…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. LaurieSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- State v. BreestSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- In re StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. LuciusSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. EtienneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Jonathan Duchesne & a. v. Hillsborough County AttorneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- State v. GiovanniSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Petition of EvansSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Doe v. N.H. Attorney Gen. (Activity Logs)Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.