Lucas v. Cate
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtGoodnow, J.
This proceeding is one in which the defendant’s right to a trial by jury cannot be doubted (N. H. Const. Pt. I, Art. 20) unless she is now barred by her waiver of that right. Ordinarily an agreement by counsel under which the trial of a case by jury has been waived will be specifically enforced except as the Trial Court may, in its discretion, determine that it should be vacated for good cause. Trainor v. Heath, 67 N. H. 384, 385; Redlon Co. v. Corporation, 91 N. H. 502, 506. Waiver of the right to a trial by jury, however, extends only to the issues then formed at the time of waiver and does…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Hackin v. Pioneer Plumbing Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Jones Ex Rel. Jones v. ChaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- Mitchell v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Vention Medical Advanced Components, Inc. d/b/a Advanced Polymers, a Vention Medical Company v. Nikolaos D. Pappas & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018