Legal Opinion
State v. Bannister
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 1995No. 95-KA-172PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IrKLIEBERT, Chief Judge.
The defendant, Larry Bannister, appeals his conviction of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute within 1000 feet of school property. Defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction, and also assigns any errors patent. For the following reasons, we affirm defendant’s conviction and remand with instructions.
The defendant was charged by bill of information filed on February 22, 1993 with possession of cocaine with intent to distribute within 1000 feet of school property1 in violation of LSA-R.S. 40:981.3. When arraigned on December…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. OliveauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- State v. WeilandLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- State v. RosiereSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- State v. FraserSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. JordanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- State v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- State v. BellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. WalkerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- State v. BatesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999