Legal Opinion
State v. Bell
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 2015No. 15-KA-354PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUSAN M. CHEHARDY, Chief Judge.
|gOn appeal, defendant challenges the trial court’s ruling allowing the State to introduce other crimes evidence at trial. For the following reasons, we affirm but remand for correction of the uniform commitment order.
Procedural History
On October 1, 2013, the Jefferson Parish District Attorney filed a bill of information charging defendant, Floyd M. Bell, Jr., with one count of possession with intent to distribute a controlled dangerous substance, to wit: cocaine, in violation of La. R.S. 40:967(A).
On December 6, 2013, the State, pursuant to La. C.E. art. 404,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. PrieurSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Copenhaver v. John Bonura & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Associated Motors, Inc. v. BurkLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. DixonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- State v. DevillierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- State v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017