Hall v. Shotwell
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.
This was an action to determine adverse claims to a strip of land in that portion of the city of Oakland on which were laid out the towns of Clinton and San Antonio. When those towns were laid out, the land in dispute was situate on both sides of a small slough or creek, called Embarcadero Creek, which ran into the estuary of San Antonio, at what was known as the Embarcadero of San Antonio. At the commencement, of the action there was on the bed of the creek, from Washington street to the Embarcadero, a street about sixty feet wide, called Commerce street, opened, graded and macadamized. The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hicks v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by9 opinions
- McKevitt v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Moakley v. Los Angeles Pacific Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Hostetter v. Los Angeles Terminal Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Ganiats Construction, Inc. v. HesseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Mitchell v. NicholsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.