Legal Opinion

Cates v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 12, 2003No. 1206-02PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · CochranCochran, J.

MEYERS, PRICE, WOMACK, JOHNSON, HERVEY, and HOLCOMB, J.J.

In this case we must decide whether a trial court abuses its discretion when it refuses to allow defense witnesses to testify at a Franks evidentiary hearing after: (1) a defendant has made a substantial preliminary showing of falsity, and (2) the State has been allowed to present testimony in support of the affidavit’s accuracy and the affiant’s veracity. 1 The court of appeals held that the refusal to permit the defense to call witnesses was within the trial court’s discretion. 2 We disagree and hold that such a refusal is an…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Dancy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Ramsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Gaston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Harrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by119 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Jones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  4. Moreno v. DretkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  5. Lane v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API