Legal Opinion
Citizens Bank of Maryland v. Strumpf.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 22, 1995No. 94-1340PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as ami-cus curiae and for divided argument is granted.
2Cited by24 opinions
- Daniel DILLEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bryan S. GUNN, Warden; Norma Wells; Sgt. Butler; B. Schelke, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. ManningCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Viceroy Gold Corp. v. AubryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- U.S. Philips Corporation v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Citizens Electric Corporation, as Representative of a Class v. Bituminous Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.