Legal Opinion

Citizens Bank of Maryland v. Strumpf.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 22, 1995No. 94-1340PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as ami-cus curiae and for divided argument is granted.

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. Daniel DILLEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bryan S. GUNN, Warden; Norma Wells; Sgt. Butler; B. Schelke, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. ManningCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. Viceroy Gold Corp. v. AubryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. U.S. Philips Corporation v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Citizens Electric Corporation, as Representative of a Class v. Bituminous Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API