Legal Opinion

Jones v. Saunders

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 10, 1961No. 531PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoose, J.

In apt time defendants moved for nonsuit. As to the cause of action based on alleged nondelivery of the deed, the exception to the refusal to nonsuit is not assigned as error and has been abandoned. But as to the alternative cause of action alleging that the deed was procured by fraud and duress, the question of the sufficiency of the evidence is raised • — ■ Assignment of error No. 26. We do not approve the method used in preserving the exception; it is not in accordance with procedural rules. When we look to the substance of the assignment, the exception is brought forward. Since there must…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McNeill v. . McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Ballard v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Wessell v. . RathjohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. Best v. . UtleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Estate of Graham v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Williams v. North Carolina State Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Estate of Graham v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Joyner v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. Penninger v. BarrierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API