Legal Opinion
Sarner v. Sarner (In Re Sarner)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 7, 1982No. BAP No. NC-81-1355-KVE, Bankruptcy No. 5-80-2059-M, Adv. No. 800441PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KATZ, Bankruptcy Judge:
Appellant Judith Sarner contends that the trial court improperly granted summary judgment on her complaint to determine dischargeability pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 528(a)(5). The debtor, her ex-husband, sought to discharge his duty to pay for her furniture. The duty arose from the property settlement agreement negotiated between the Sarners in their marital dissolution. We AFFIRM based on appellant’s failure to meet the requirements of Fed.R. Civ.P. 56(e).
Our appellate review proceeds as follows:
“In reviewing an order granting summary judgment, we first determine…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jack Fristoe v. Reynolds Metals Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Mutual Fund Investors, Inc. v. Putnam Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Kung v. Fom Investment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bell v. Stuerke (In Re Stuerke)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Official Creditors Committee v. Tuchinsky (In Re Major Dynamics, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1986
- Holland v. Commissioner (In Re Holland)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1989
- Southwest Bank v. Parsons (In Re Parsons)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1991
- Jones v. Jones (In Re Jones)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.