Legal Opinion

Marilyn L. Hudson v. William P. Barr

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 30, 1993No. 92-6162PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant William P. Barr (“Barr”), former Attorney General of the United States, challenges the district court’s decision to indefinitely continue a restraining order without consent. We dissolve the restraining order and instruct the district court to conduct a preliminary injunction hearing without further delay for the following reasons.

I

Plaintiff-appellee Marilyn L. Hudson (“Hudson”), an Assistant United States Attorney in the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Tennessee, filed employment discrimination charges (sex…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. Bayshore Associates, Inc., a Michigan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  3. Sims v. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  4. Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Flight Engineers' International Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Levine v. Comcoa Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Donald Linville William R. Gaitten, Estate of v. Teamsters Miscellaneous and Industrial Workers Union, Local 284Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. Ecoshield Pest Solutions North DC LLC v. DixonDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
  4. Howell v. Leprino Foods CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. Jetchill Ltd v. Shenzhen Jiarui Minghui Trading Co., Ltd. and ExploNova StoreDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2025

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API