Legal Opinion

Howell v. Leprino Foods Company

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 12, 2020No. 1:18-cv-01404Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 ANDREW HOWELL, CASE NO. 1:18-CV-01404-AWI-BAM 5 Plaintiff, ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 6 v. FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 7 LEPRINO FOODS COMPANY; (Doc. Nos. 26, 29, 38) LEPRINO FOODS DAIRY PRODUCTS 8 COMPANY, 9 Defendants. 10 11 I. Introduction 12 In this lawsuit an employee is suing his two employers for violating California’s wage- 13 and-hour laws. The employee is Plaintiff Andrew Howell (“Plaintiff”). The two employers are 14 Defendant Leprino Foods Company and Defendant Leprino Foods Dairy Productions Company 15…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Brooks v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Newgen, LLC v. Safe Cig, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API