Legal Opinion

ICG-Internet Commerce Group, Inc. v. Wolf

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided September 25, 2007No. CV06-01345-PHX-EHCPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EARL H. CARROLL, District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt.12). Defendant James Wolf 1 (“Defendant Wolf’) filed the only response. 2 (Dkt.21). For the reasons discussed herein, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt.12) is granted in-part, and denied in-part.

1. Background

The following facts are undisputed except as otherwise indicated. Plaintiff is the operator of several adult-oriented websites, including a site located at www. hollywoodsextapes.com. (Plaintiffs Separate Statement of Facts “PSOF” ¶ 1). In laté 2005, Plaintiff acquired an…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API