ICG-Internet Commerce Group, Inc. v. Wolf
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EARL H. CARROLL, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt.12). Defendant James Wolf 1 (“Defendant Wolf’) filed the only response. 2 (Dkt.21). For the reasons discussed herein, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt.12) is granted in-part, and denied in-part.
1. Background
The following facts are undisputed except as otherwise indicated. Plaintiff is the operator of several adult-oriented websites, including a site located at www. hollywoodsextapes.com. (Plaintiffs Separate Statement of Facts “PSOF” ¶ 1). In laté 2005, Plaintiff acquired an…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.