Legal Opinion
Hollander v. Flash Dancers Topless Club
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 28, 2004No. 03 Civ. 2717(PKC)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CASTEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Roy Den Hollander (“Den Hollander”) brings this action pro se against what he alleges to be a criminal enterprise that spans the globe, from New York to Russia to Chechnya to Cyprus to Mexico. The defendants are alleged to be members of the enterprise and include plaintiffs former wife, her mother, associates and divorce lawyers, various exotic dancing clubs, members of alleged organized crime groups, modeling and escort agencies, a Cypriot bank and New York City police detective. Various other actors are identified by partial name or by…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chance v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ed Ex Rel. Vd v. TuffarelliDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Kramer v. LOCKWOOD PENSION SERVICES, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Mackin v. AubergerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Jenkins ex rel. Miller-Jenkins v. MillerDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2013
- Maddaloni Jewelers, Inc. v. Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.