Legal Opinion
Humphreys, Hutcheson & Moseley v. Donovan
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided June 22, 1983No. 78-3450PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOHN T. NIXON, District Judge.
This action seeking a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief presents novel and sensitive issues under sections 203(b) and 204, 29 U.S.C. § 433(b) and § 434 of Title II of the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (LMRDA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 401 et seq. Among other things, § 203 requires disclosure and reporting of certain information by every person involved in labor persuader activities and § 204 provides an exemption to attorneys from the disclosure and reporting requirements of § 203 for information obtained in the course of a…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chubb Integrated Systems Ltd. v. National BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
- Humphreys, Hutcheson and Moseley v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- John B. v. GoetzDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010
- Royal Surplus Lines Insurance v. Sofamor Danek Group, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999
- Burke v. The TN. Walking Horse BreedersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.