Legal Opinion

Max Jordan Bauunternehmung v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 27, 1986No. 642-83CPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARKINS, Judge:

Max Jordan Bauuntemehmung (Jordan) is a construction enterprise in the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) that, operating as a general contractor, obtained a firm fixed price contract on February 8,1971, to construct two additional jet fuel underground storage tanks at the Rhein/Main Air Base, near Frankfurt/Am Main, FRG. The construction work was completed and accepted, and the only dispute is whether Jordan is entitled to additional compensation on a constructive change claim and a delay claim as a result of the contracting officer’s directive to select from an approved…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. Koppers Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Miller Elevator Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  2. PCL Construction Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. Bataco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. Southern California Edison v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. Petrochem Services, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API