Calvary Christian School, Inc. v. Huffstuttler
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentBetty C. Dickey, Justice
I disagree with the majority’s finding that CCS is entitled to a directed verdict on Preston Huffstuttler’s outrage claim arising out of the allegations of clandestine surveillance at the school. The majority articulates its holding as follows:
The record, however, does not reflect any evidence that the video ever recorded any footage at the school. The essence of Preston’s outrage claim is that the school could have used the camera to video tape him as he changed clothes. Yet, based up on our strict approach in claims for outrage, the mere possibility that the school could have taped him does…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Caddo Valley v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Conagra, Inc. v. StrotherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DolphSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Johnson v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Steel Erectors, Inc. v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972