Legal Opinion

United States v. Sorrells

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 22, 1998No. 96-40873PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:

A jury convicted David Sorrells (“Sor-rells”) of using a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). We affirmed his conviction on direct appeal and on Sorrells’ first motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He now appeals from the district court’s denial of his second § 2255 motion to vacate his § 924(c)(1) conviction. We affirm.

I

The facts in this case are relatively straightforward. Both parties agree that, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the relevant facts are as follows:…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. United States v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Marlon GarthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  3. Hooker v. SivleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. Simpson v. MatesanzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  5. Osker McNeal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API