United States v. Sorrells
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:
A jury convicted David Sorrells (“Sor-rells”) of using a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). We affirmed his conviction on direct appeal and on Sorrells’ first motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. He now appeals from the district court’s denial of his second § 2255 motion to vacate his § 924(c)(1) conviction. We affirm.
I
The facts in this case are relatively straightforward. Both parties agree that, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the relevant facts are as follows:…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States v. DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Marlon GarthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Hooker v. SivleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Simpson v. MatesanzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Osker McNeal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.