Legal Opinion

(HC) Holguin v. Pfeiffer

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 31, 2021No. 1:20-cv-01715Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FELIPE ROMAN HOLGUIN, Case No. 1:20-cv-01715-NONE-HBK 12 Petitioner, PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND 13 v. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL INCORPORATED IN HIS PETITION AND 14 CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, OPPOSITION ARE DENIED 15 Respondent. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO 16 DISMISS1 17 (Doc. No. 8) 18 FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 19 Petitioner Felipe Roman Holguin (“Petitioner” or “Holguin”), a state prisoner is 20 proceeding on his pro se petition for writ of habeas…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API