Legal Opinion

Welton v. Atkinson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1898No. 8268PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the district court of Cass county. Tried below before Chapman, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, C. J.

In error proceeding's in this action it is complained that the trial court, refused, on motion of plaintiff, to suppress certain depositions and, over objections, admitted them in evidence. An examination of the transcript inclusive of the correction thereof discloses, by fair reading, that the motion to suppress the depositions was properly presented, both in point of manner and time. The addition to the transcript allowed on motion of defendant was evidently made with a purpose to make it appear that the motion for suppression of the depositions urns not interposed until after the trial had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. DeGraw v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  2. Neese v. Farmer's InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  3. Byrd v. CochranNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Hewitt v. MorganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Beck v. Associates Discount Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Carron v. AbounadorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Molina v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1947
  4. Sheridan County v. McKinneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Tildesley Coal Co. v. American Fuel Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API