Legal Opinion

Neese v. Farmer's Insurance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 6, 1881PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Hamilton District Gowrt. Action upon a policy of insurance. There was a Yerdiet and judgment for plaintiff; defendant appeals. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

j jjyrojnjQj.. another o£ state. I. The plaintiff was permitted to read to the jury the depositions of plaintiff and his wife, giving material testimony in his behalf, The deposition was taken in Nebraska, before a notary public and his official seal did not disclose his name. Objection to the deposition, on the grounds that the seal of the notary did not show the name of the officer, was made by motion to suppress, and at the trial the objection was renewed. It is not shown that the seal of the notary is sufficient under the law of Nebraska. We will not take judicial notice of the statutes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howard v. City Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Stephens v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. SheppardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Sieverts v. National Benevolent Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  3. Davis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  4. Meuer v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Hadley v. GregorySupreme Court of Iowa · 1881

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API