Redmond v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ALSTON, Judge.
John Brian Redmond (appellant) appeals his conviction of violating Code § 18.2-308.2 by possessing a firearm after *257having been convicted of a felony. Appellant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence. Appellant also argues the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction. Finding no error, we affirm appellant’s conviction.
I. BACKGROUND
Applying well-established principles of review on appeal, we state the evidence in the light most favorable to the party prevailing below, the Commonwealth in this instance. Haskins v. Commonwealth, 31…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Steven Joseph Blevins v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2014
- Bellamy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
- Christopher Louis Smith v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2020
- Eric Cherron Jones v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2019
- Redmond v. Com.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.