Legal Opinion

In Re Panas

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 8, 1986No. 19-11373PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Chief Judge:

The matter for resolution is whether we should grant a mortgagee’s motion for relief from the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d) of the Bankruptcy Code (“the Code”) in order to allow it to foreclose its mortgage on the basis that the debtor has failed to make adequate periodic payments on the debt. For the reasons outlined below, we will grant the motion for relief from the automatic stay.

The facts of this controversy are as follows: 1 Fourteen years ago the debtor borrowed $10,350.00 from a lender, in exchange for which the debtor granted the lender…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ukrainian Savings and Loan Ass'n v. Trident Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Royal Bank of Pennsylvania v. Three Tuns, Inc. (In Re Three Tuns, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. In Re GravesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re PanasUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Philadelphia Consumer Discount Co. v. Gurst (In Re Gurst)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. In Re SennhennUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
  4. First Federal Savings Bank v. Sierra (In Re Sierra)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1987
  5. Panas v. Polonia Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re Panas)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API