Legal Opinion
In Re People in the interest of Minor Child C.J.T.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided December 4, 2023No. 23SA131PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
statute outlining the duties and authority of the Ombudsman does not authorize the Ombudsman to file a motion seeking information in a case in which it is not a party but rather, to obtain such information, the Ombudsman must comply with the Colorado Open Records Act, §§ 24-72-200.1 to -206, C.R.S. (2023); and (3) in any event, the Ombudsman had no right to obtain the full, unredacted Report, most of which addressed matters beyond the scope of the Ombudsman’s jurisdiction. Accordingly, the court makes its rule to show cause absolute. The Supreme Court of the State of Colorado 2 East 14th…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United Nuclear Corporation v. Cranford Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- UMB Bank, N.A. v. Landmark Towers Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017
- State Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. StjernholmSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- The People of the State of Colorado v. A.B. and J.S. In the Interest of Minor Child: B.C.B.; and B.C.B.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2025