Legal Opinion

Atala v. Kopelowitz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 20, 1995No. 95-1756PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We find error in a trial court order striking the defendants’ pleadings, and entry of a default against the defendants, as a sanction for failure to make properly noticed discovery, or to acquire new counsel within a time certain ordered by the court, because the trial court failed by order to properly notify the defendants of the consequences of the failure to do the above referred to particular acts. Under the circumstances, the ultimate sanction of default was too harsh a penalty as lesser sanctions would suffice to ensure compliance with the court’s order and the rules of procedure for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bieling v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Kleinschmidt v. GATOR OFFICE SUPPLY AND FURNITURE, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Owens v. HowardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Celebrity Cruises, Inc. v. FernandesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API