Legal Opinion
City of Pittsburgh v. Kronzek
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 2, 1971No. Appeal No. 11 Tr. Dkt. 1971PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Bowman,
Appellants, Srul and Eva Kronzek,1 are owners of numerous deteriorating and dilapidated rental buildings in the City of Pittsburgh which are the subject of this litigation. Between October 24, 1967 and November 27,1968, the Director of the Pittsburgh Department of Public Safety, on the basis of visual inspections of the premises by departmental inspectors, issued six2 notices of condemnation as to structures owned by the Kronzeks. The inspectors, on the basis of their observations, had determined the subject buildings to be dan*662gerous and a safety hazard to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wyman v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Moodie v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Griffith v. Clearfield Truck Rentals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- McCullough v. Holland Furnace Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Girard Trust Corn Exchange Bank v. Brink's, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sobocinski v. City of WilliamsportCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Herrit v. Code Management Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- City of Pittsburgh v. PivirottoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Simpson v. City of New CastleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Blanchard v. City of RalstonNebraska Court of Appeals · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.