Legal Opinion · Dissent

Armour v. State of Ohio

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 27, 1991No. C88-1104YPublished

1Dissent

BATCHELDER, District Judge,

dissenting.*

I. Introduction

Plaintiffs in this case bring two claims, one for violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1973, and the other for violation of the Fifteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. I conclude that neither of these claims can be established based on the evidence presented here, and even construing the evidence as the majority construes it, neither the statute nor the 15th Amendment can be found to have been violated by the district line challenged by plaintiffs in this case. I therefore respectfully…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Chisom v. RoemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Mars Ketchum v. Jane M. ByrneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Garza v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API