Legal Opinion

Hewitt v. Peterson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 26, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

This cause is before us upon the plaintiff’s appeals from an interlocutory decree which overruled her thirty-two exceptions to a master’s report and confirmed the report, and from a final decree which does not grant her all that she wants.

The exceptions were dealt with properly. There was no report of the evidence before the master. It is elementary *94that in such a case no exception will be sustained to the master’s findings of fact. Henderson v. Foster, 182 Mass. 447. Nearly all the exceptions relate to such findings, and present no question, either of law or fact, with which this court will…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Henderson v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bartlett v. Roosevelt, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  2. Arcisz v. PietrowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Baumgartner v. DohertyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Russo v. GullaMassachusetts Superior Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API