Legal Opinion

Broderick v. Aaron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 26, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

Pursuant to sections 80 and 120 of the Banking Law, the Superintendent of Banks brought this action to recover an assessment against stockholders of the Bank of United States. The defendants, respondents, were named as defendants upon, an allegation that they were the owners and record holders of thirty shares of the stock. The respondents impleaded the appellants under Civil Practice Act, section 193, subdivision 2, upon the ground that prior to the closing of the bank they had sold the thirty shares to the appellants, who admit the purchase thereof, but claim that they immediately resold…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . UnderhillNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Richards v. . RobinNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Richards v. RobinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. Gaffney v. People's Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  5. Gaffney v. . People's Trust Company of BinghamtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Broderick v. AaronNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Broderick v. AaronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API