Legal Opinion
State v. Brocca
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 16, 2003No. 3D02-2652PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
842 So.2d 291 (2003)
The STATE of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
Daniel BROCCA, Respondent.
No. 3D02-2652.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 16, 2003.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Frank J. Ingrassia, Assistant Attorney General (Fort Lauderdale), for Petitioner.
Richard G. Dunberg, South Miami, for Respondent.
Before COPE, GERSTEN, and FLETCHER, JJ.
2Per curiam
We affirm the trial court's finding that Section 90.803(24), Florida Statutes (2001), is unconstitutional. We agree with the trial court's reasoning, which mirrored the reasoning in the Florida Supreme Court case of Conner…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. TownsendSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Conner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- State v. BroccaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008