Legal Opinion

E. H. Perry & Co. v. Langbehn

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1923No. 3119PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Ctjreton

This case is here on certified questions from the Honorable <Jourx of Civil Appeals for the First District.

E. H. Perry & Company, a corporation, cotton exporters, and Langbehn Brothers, shipowners, entered into the agreement shown by the cotton freight engagement note, which reads as follows:

"Cotton Freight Engagement Note.

HLZ

Langbehn Bros., Steamship Agents.

No. 486

Galveston, Texas, March 27, 1916.

"Messrs. E. H. Perry & Co.,
"We beg to confirm your engagement of room for 3000 — Three Thousand — Bales of Standard Compressed Cotton from Galveston to Genoa — (a 300 cts. per 100 lbs., basis 100 A1…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The ThamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Moore v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Schloss v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Hearne v. GillettTexas Supreme Court · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Rsui Indemnity Company v. the Lynd CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Tawes v. BarnesTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Luling Oil & Gas Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. WeedTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Lone Star Gas Co. v. X-Ray Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API