Legal Opinion

Yuen v. McMann

California Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1893No. 14480PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and. County of San ■ Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.'

1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.

This is an action against McMann, as sheriff, and his co-defendants as sureties, upon his official bond, to recover possession of certain personal property taken by him as such sheriff under a writ of possession issued upon a judgment obtained by one Lee Chuck v. Quan Wo Chong Co., in an action of unlawful detainer, and by which writ the said defendant was commanded to place the plaintiff in that action in possession of the premises described therein, and to make out of the personal property of plaintiff’s assignors the amount of damages recovered by the judgment upon which the writ was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chuck v. Quan Wo Chong Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Van Pelt v. LittlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Ghiradelli v. BourlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sluder v. City of San AntonioTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Miles v. WrightArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  3. First National Bank of Marysville v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Bell v. PeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Anderson v. PhegleyOregon Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API