Legal Opinion

Creighton v. County of Pope

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1944No. 27713. Appellate Court affirmed in part and reversed in part; circuit court reversedPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

The plaintiffs, Nancy Ann Creighton and four other persons, individually, Mae Hatton, administratrix of the estate of Gus Hatton, deceased, and Arthur Poe, administrator of the estate of Mary Lou Poe, deceased,.filed their second amended complaint in the circuit court of Pope county against the defendant, the county of Pope, seeking awards representing the balance alleged to be due and owing them as benefits under “An act for the relief of the blind.” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1943, chap. 23, par. 279 et seq.) Defendant answered the complaint, evidence was heard and judgments rendered in favor of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schreiber v. SharplessSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Wilcox v. BierdIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Selden v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Eddy v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  5. People Ex Rel. Heydenreich v. LyonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Insull v. New York World-Telegram CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
  2. Board of Trustees v. Village of Glen EllynAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949
  3. Board of Social Welfare v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Shapiro v. ChernoffAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  5. Sickler v. National Dairy Products Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API