Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Union & Mercantile Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 20, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHumphreys, J.

This ease was here on appeal un: der the style of Union & Mercantile Trust Co. v. Hudson, to determine whether the bill stated a cause of action. The case is reported in 147 Ark. 7. Reference is made to it for the allegations contained in the bill, instead of setting them out herein. Upon the reversal of the decree dismissing the bill and a remand of the cause, an answer was filed interposing, among other defenses, the defense that, after appellee’s executrix had notified appellants that she was claiming the funds on deposit in the First National Bank as her individual property, she filed a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union & Mercantile Trust Co. v. HudsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  2. Thompson v. WilhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  3. Johnson v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  4. Beam v. CopelandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rinke v. WeedmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  2. Greif Bros. Cooperage Corp. v. United States Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  3. Burke v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  4. Ex Parte K.W., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2022
  5. Greif Bros. Cooperage Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. United States Gypsum Company, an Illinois Corporation, United States Gypsum Company, an Illinois Corporation v. Greif Bros. Cooperage Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API