Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Heiner

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 28, 1930No. 5895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

This is an action to recover income and profits taxes for the year 1917, alleged to-have been illegally collected after the collection was barred by the statute of limitations-

The defendant has filed an affidavit of defense, averring:(1) That the statute of limitations had not expired at the date of collection, by reason of the fact that a waiver had been executed by the taxpayer and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue under the provisions of' section 250(d) of the Revenue Act of 1921 in the language following:

“I, Max Solomon, in consideration of the assurance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stange v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  2. Roy & Titcomb, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  3. Washington Coal & Coke Co. v. HeinerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sabin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  2. United States v. Southern Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. Remington-Rand, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API