Legal Opinion

Stange v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 4, 1929No. F-261PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGkeen, Judge

This case involves taxes for the calendar year of 1914 assessed under the revenue act of 1918, and for which an income-tax return was filed by the plaintiff on February 19, 1915. The other facts material to the decision may be summarized as follows:

A. H. Stange, father of plaintiff, prior to March 24, 1914, was the owner of 1,780 shares of the 2,500 shares of the stock in the A. H. Stange Company, a corporation, the remainder ■of this stock being held by his sons and daughters, or daughters and sons-in-law. On March 24, 1914, A. H. Stange organized a corporation known as the Union Land…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lynch v. HornbySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Lynch v. TurrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Rockefeller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Allen v. McKay & Co.California Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
  2. Sabin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  3. Eclipse Lawn Mower Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  4. Mascot Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  5. Panther Rubber Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API