Legal Opinion
Okudinani v. Rose
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 9, 2019No. 17-2556Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
17-2556 Okudinani v. Rose UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Howell v. New York Post Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Lore v. City of SyracuseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Mark Cook v. Roberta Sheldon and Nelson Saldana, New York State TroopersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Stuto v. FleishmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.