Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Hemingway

Suffolk County District Court

Decided November 24, 1980PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stuart Namm, J.

This is a special proceeding under section 121 of the Agriculture and Markets Law. The complainant avers that the dog which is owned by the respondent, a male with the body structure of a German Shepherd type, is a dangerous dog within the meaning of the law, and seeks to have the animal permanently confined or destroyed.

While there was some question during the hearing as to the identification of the animal in question, it was clear to the court that the Golden Labrador-Malemute mixed breed *191dog conceded to have been owned by the respondent, and named…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Muller v. . McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. La Borie v. HabesWebster Justice of the Peace Court · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Van Patten v. City of BinghamtonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2001
  2. Nardi v. GonzalezYonkers City Court · 1995
  3. University Towers Associates v. GibsonCivil Court of the City of New York · 2007
  4. Serby v. Town of HempsteadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  5. Serby v. Town of HempsteadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API