Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Region VII Area Agency on Aging

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 2008No. Docket 274939PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

In this taxpayer suit for recovery of compensation paid and received in alleged violation of MCL 46.30a, plaintiff Bob Hughes appeals as of right the trial court’s opinion and order granting summary disposition in favor of defendants. Because we conclude that the prohibitions against appointment or employment of a county commissioner provided for under MCL 46.30a apply only to officers or entities under the direct and exclusive control of the county in which the commissioner sits, and that defendant Region VII Area Agency on Aging (Region VII) is not such an officer or entity, we affirm.

I.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Fast Air, Inc v. KnightMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. In Re WirsingMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Driver v. HanleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Solution Source, Inc. v. LPR Associates Ltd. PartnershipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Jawad a Shah Md Pc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Alfieri v. BertorelliMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Hanlin v. Saugatuck TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Hackel v. Macomb County CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Mercantile Bank Mortgage Co. v. NGPCP/BRYS Centre, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API