Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State Ex Rel. Lane Drug Stores, Inc. v. Simpson

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 25, 1936Published

1ConcurrenceWhitfield, C. J.

(concurring). — In State, ex rel., v. Dillon, 42 Fla. 95, text 114, et seq., 28 So. 781, it is said:

“Sections 14 and 17, Article III, Constitution of 1885, read as follows: ‘Sec. 14. Any bill may originate in either Plouse of the Legislature, and after being passed in one house, may be amended in the other.’ ‘Sec. 17. Every bill shall be read by its title on its first reading in either House, unless one-third of the members present when such bill may be pending shall deem it expedient to dispense with this rule. Every bill shall be read by its sections on its second reading and on its final…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Turner v. HockerSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. BuckleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  3. West v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  4. Johnson v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State ex rel. Lamar v. DillonSupreme Court of Florida · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API