Legal Opinion
Scaffold-Russ Dilworth, Ltd. v. Shared Management Group, Ltd.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 31, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motion of Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (defendant) to dismiss the complaint on the ground that plaintiff, a Canadian corporation that rents and sells scaffolding, could not maintain this action because it was “doing business in this state without authority’ (Business Corporation Law § 1312 [a]). The record establishes that plaintiff had rented scaffolding to contractors at eight public and private construction projects in New York in 1991 and 1992, and had leased a facility in the State for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Construction Specialties, Inc. v. Hartford InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Parkwood Furniture Co. v. OK Furniture Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Interline Furniture, Inc. v. Hodor Industries Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nasso v. SeagalDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Audemars Piguet Holding S.A. v. Swiss Watch International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Scaffold-Russ Dilworth Ltd. v. Shared Management Group, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Scaffold-Russ Dilworth Ltd. v. Shared Management Group, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Cable First Construction Inc. v. Lepetiuk Engineering Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.