Legal Opinion
Schnore v. Joyner
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 17, 1931No. 20360PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. Where suit was brought to recover damages of a master and his servant because of the negligence of the latter, and the master was described therein as “Southern Bearing & Parts Company, a corporation,” and where after the filing of the suit the plaintiff discovered that there was no corporation by this name but that the person intended to be sued as master was in fact an individual who did business under the trade name of Southern Bearing & Parts Company, the court did not err in allowing the plaintiff to amend the petition by inserting the name of the individual doing business under that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Metropolitan Street Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Eslinger v. HerndonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Thompson v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Georgia Railway & Power Co v. HeadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Parker v. KilgoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Martin v. WaltmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Mauldin v. StognerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- London Iron & Metal Co. v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.