Dave's Place, Inc. v. Liquor Control Comm.
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentNorth, C. J.
Plaintiff corporation seeks a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the liquor control commission of this State to issue to plaintiff two beer licenses.
I think the writ should be denied for the following reasons:
The Constitution of this State invested the legislature with power to establish a liquor control commission, “who, subject to statutory limitations, shall exercise complete control of the alcoholic beverage traffic within this State.” The liquor control act (Act No. 8, Pub. Acts 1933 [Ex. Sess.]) contains the following provisions:
“Sec. 17. The commission is hereby authorized to issue…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Toan v. McGinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Scott v. Arcada Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Johnson v. Liquor Control CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Simonton v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Detroit Bar Ass'n v. American Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1933