State v. Barger
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
Defendant appeals from his conviction for the crime of Ex-Convict in Possession of a Firearm, ORS 166.270. We affirm.
Defendant first assigns as error the denial by the trial court of his motion to suppress a gun found by police in the house where he was arrested. Defendant’s motion to suppress was based upon several theories, but only that of consent to search was argued at the motion hearing or raised on appeal. The motion stated in relevant part that "there was no valid consent to the search or seizure * * *.” The accompanying memorandum stated that no consent to search was asked of anyone…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- State v. RowleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State v. WestbrookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. WallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- State v. CaulderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. PeasleeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. ConeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. HartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987