Strong v. McConnel
Supreme Court of Vermont
This is a writ of Error, brought to correct proceedings had in an action on book, originally commenced before a single Magistrate, appealed to the County Court, who rendered a judgement to account, September Term, 1830, and appointed auditors, by whom the following special report of facts was made. “ That they find a balance due from the defendant to the plaintiff offifty-four dollars and eighteen cents, to balance book accounts between them.
Read the full summary
This is a writ of Error, brought to correct proceedings had in an action on book, originally commenced before a single Magistrate, appealed to the County Court, who rendered a judgement to account, September Term, 1830, and appointed auditors, by whom the following special report of facts was made. “ That they find a balance due from the defendant to the plaintiff offifty-four dollars and eighteen cents, to balance book accounts between them. And said auditors further report, the accompanying account marked A. which is all the account exhibited to them ; also a statement thereon shewing that…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court delivered by
Baylies, J.
In this case a report of auditors in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant was made to the County Court, and was accepted, and judgement was rendered thereon by said Court, to which the defendant excepts, and a full record of the proceedings in the action is brought here to be inspected by the Court, and for the correction of errors, if any there be.
1st. As the plaintiff was retained in the cause of the de *344fondant Hall, just as it was coming on for trial, September Term, 1818, it is possible, that three dollars was a full,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Farrar v. BesseySupreme Court of Vermont · 1852
- In re BrownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1842