Legal Opinion
Southmayd v. Apria Healthcare, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided January 31, 2006No. 3:04-cv-215PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PHILLIPS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Richard Southmayd, a 58-year old male, brings this action for age discrimination and retaliation under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. and the Tennessee Human Rights Act, Tenn.Code Anno. § 4-21-101 et seq., and for retaliatory discharge under the Tennessee Public Protection Act, TenmCode Ann. § 50-1-304 and Tennessee common law. Defendant Apria Healthcare, Inc., has moved for summary judgment with regard to all of plaintiffs causes of action on the grounds that there are no genuine issues of material fact…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Simmons v. American Apartment Management Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2014
- Conley v. Yellow Freight System, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2007
- Crane v. Monterey Mushroom, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2012
- Johnson v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Perry v. Young Touchstone Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.