Legal Opinion

Lentell v. Boston & Worcester Street Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 20, 1909PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knowlton, O. J.

This is a petition for the assessment of damages under the St. of 1908, c. 163,* for the erection and maintenance of a trestle on Boylston Street in the city of Newton, in front of the petitioner’s premises. It was agreed that, if the judge † was of opinion that the petition could be maintained on the agreed facts and the testimony, he might order a formal verdict for the petitioner for $500. The judge ruled that the facts and evidence would warrant this verdict, and he directed the jury to return it accordingly, reporting the case for our determination. The question before us…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Story v. . New York Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Lahr v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Sauer v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Muhlker v. New York & Harlem RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Lewis v. . New York Harlem R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  2. Board of Survey v. Suburban Land Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  3. Onorato Brothers, Inc. v. MASS. TURNPIKE AUTHORITYMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  4. Barnes v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Peabody v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API