Legal Opinion
Diversified Products Corp. v. Sports Stores, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 31, 1968No. Civ. No. 16848PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARVEY, District Judge:
The plaintiffs are here seeking an injunction and damages for the alleged infringement of two different patents, United States Patent No. 3,171,652, a mechanical patent, and United States Design Patent No. 203,608, a design patent. The mechanical patent is for an exercising weight filled with solidified material and the second patent in suit is for a design for a barbell weight.
The mechanical patent (Newman ’652) was issued on March 2, 1965 to Joe W. Newman. As a result of subsequent assignments, it was owned at the time of suit by the two corporate plaintiffs,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977
- Lundy Electronics & Systems, Inc. v. Optical Recognition Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1973
- National Steel Corp. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1970
- Ward Machinery Co. v. WM. C. Staley Machinery Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1976