Moore v. State

on rehearing.

June 25, 1920.

MORROW, Judge.

Responding to appellant’s motion for rehearing and the earnest and forceful argument of his counsel thereon, we have carefully gone over the record in this ease.

The point upon which stress is laid is that the act of the appellant in making footprints for comparison with those supposed to have been made by the offender, and in placing his bare foot in tracks found near the scene of the crime, was an infringement of. the rule which makes one accused of crime immune from giving evidence against himself. The rule, as applicable to the particular subject in…