Guerrero v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was charged with the theft of "one head of hogs.” It is contended this is not a sufficient designation of the property, and not in compliance with correct pleading; that the charge should have been the theft of one hog. It is also contended the pleading is not grammatically correct; that "one head” is in the singular, and “hogs” is plural, denoting more than one. This criticism is hypercritical.
While under arrest appellant was carried by the sheriff to a point where tracks were found upon the ground. These tracks were supposed to have been made by the…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Cabrera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- McKee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Briscoe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Landry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Trinity County Dumber Co. v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.