Legal Opinion

Borkoski v. Tumilty

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 28, 1977No. 76-441PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stouder

This is an interlocutory appeal pursuant to the provisions of Supreme Court Rule 308. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 110A, par. 308.) All the prerequisites of Rule 308 have been met and no questions are raised concerning the propriety of using the interlocutory appeal procedure. Given the nature of the issues presented for review, a detailed account of the pleadings is required.

Defendant, City of DeKalb, appeals from an order of the circuit court of LaSalle County which vacated an earlier order that had dismissed plaintiff’s complaint as to the City of DeKalb. The plaintiff, Gene Borkoski, was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lipsey v. Michael Reese HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Janove v. BaconIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Ingram v. MFA InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. Calvert Distillers Co. v. VesolowskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. Hoagland v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barbour v. Fred Berglund & Sons, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. Yedor v. Centre Properties, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. Thielke v. Osman Construction Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Leonard v. City of StreatorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Ashley v. HillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API